The thought comes fast in the exam room: how are they doing this? Najat Fadlalla, a developmental behavioral pediatric fellow, says pause right there. Much of the parenting evidence clinicians lean on was built on one narrow slice of the world, and normal parenting from outside it keeps getting treated as a problem. She has caught herself doing it. Here is how to tell a real problem from an unfamiliar one.

⏱️ Chapters:
0:00 Introduction
0:33 What is missing became who is missing
1:33 The ADHD treatment that sometimes beats medication
2:28 Most parenting advice is handed out off the cuff
3:40 Who decided what normal parenting looks like
4:54 Ask why before you call it a problem
6:02 Every culture wants the same things for its kids
7:00 The mother who rejected modern Western parenting
7:36 She agreed with the mother first, then changed the plan
8:44 She catches herself judging parents too
9:27 The parenting style the evidence says damages kids
10:31 The studies where strict parenting did no harm
11:20 What to do with the thought you should not say out loud
13:30 WEIRD: who the evidence was actually built on
15:34 Take home messages

About this episode:
Najat Fadlalla trained in parent behavior training, the first line evidence-based treatment for children with ADHD or at risk of it, and kept running into the same question: what is missing from this field, which became who is missing from it. In this conversation she walks through what parent coaching actually is, how it gets delivered in the real world through long group programs and quick parenting pearls in clinic, and why the evidence underneath it deserves more humility. She points to the WEIRD problem, the finding that much of the psychology and sociology evidence base comes from populations that are white, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic, and to studies out of the Far East and West Asia showing that authoritarian parenting is not associated with the negative outcomes in collectivist communities that it is elsewhere. She describes the moment that changed her own practice, when she realized she had been pathologizing parenting behaviors even though she comes from a culture with different parenting values herself. She tells the story of a mother who announced up front that she was against modern Western parenting and wanted her daughter to face consequences, and how she kept that mother's values intact while adding what was missing rather than arguing with her. She offers a three step approach for clinicians: know your biases, pause the automatic thought and ask where it came from, and treat the recommendation as something you deliberate on with the family instead of hand to them. Her closing argument is that clinicians and researchers share the responsibility here, because families come in wanting advice that is tailored to them, not a standard recommendation they have to translate into their own values.

🤝 Partner with me on the KevinMD platform:
With over three million monthly readers and half a million social media followers, I give you direct access to the doctors and patients who matter most. Let's work together to tell your story.

➡️ PARTNER WITH KEVINMD: https://kevinmd.com/influencer
➡️ SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST: https://www.kevinmd.com/podcast
➡️ RECOMMENDED BY KEVINMD: https://www.kevinmd.com/recommended

#Pediatrics #Parenting #CulturalCompetence