Credibility as an expert witness is everything, and AI is quietly destroying it in courtroom after courtroom. Tracy Liberatore, a former physician assistant turned attorney who runs the National Expert Academy, walks through the real cases where reports were thrown out after AI hallucinated citations, what responsible AI use looks like, and why clinicians are uniquely exposed: training teaches you to defend a conclusion, not a process. If you do expert work or are considering it, this is the briefing.

⏱️ Chapters:
0:00 Introduction
0:24 Why an attorney chose to write about AI now
1:33 The expert witness cases AI has already taken down
2:41 What makes AI use a career-ending issue on the stand
3:16 Are more clinicians actually using AI in reports
3:38 The only responsible way to use AI in this work
4:07 The brain flip from SOAP note to legal report
5:53 Why you do not need law school to do this work
8:01 The rule: never cite a case AI gave you without reading it
8:50 What happens to your career if you get caught
10:07 What attorneys actually want from an expert
11:32 Your report is your artifact, the process is what gets cross-examined

About this episode:
Tracy Liberatore spent ten years as a physician assistant before going to law school, then built Med-Legal Pro and recently launched the National Expert Academy. In this conversation she lays out the new reality for medical experts: courts are catching AI-fabricated citations, and the careers built on those reports are collapsing in real time. She walks through Coles v Ellison, where an AI expert was taken down by AI; Concord Music Group v Anthropic, where hallucinated citations surfaced in a data scientist's report; and Alito v Harbor Freight, where the court allowed AI use because the expert could account for exactly what he had done. She explains why clinical training leaves physicians especially exposed: SOAP notes train you to defend a conclusion, not a process. She then walks through what responsible AI use actually looks like, from research help to citation double-checks. She closes with what attorneys actually want from an expert (candor, communication, no advocacy) and one line every clinician thinking about this work should hold onto: your report is your artifact, and the process is what gets cross-examined.

🤝 Partner with me on the KevinMD platform:
With over three million monthly readers and half a million social media followers, I give you direct access to the doctors and patients who matter most. Let's work together to tell your story.

➡️ PARTNER WITH KEVINMD: https://kevinmd.com/influencer
➡️ SUBSCRIBE TO THE PODCAST: https://www.kevinmd.com/podcast
➡️ RECOMMENDED BY KEVINMD: https://www.kevinmd.com/recommended

#ExpertWitness #PhysicianCareer #AIinMedicine